home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: inforamp.net!ts31-16
- From: crs0794@inforamp.net (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Is USR going to support 42bis+ on future courier upgrades?
- Date: 26 Mar 1996 04:03:17 GMT
- Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100
- Message-ID: <4j7qa5$l33@sam.inforamp.net>
- References: <4j2fv1$8kf@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> <4j2iun$a3t@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4j3r1f$1tc4@seminole.gate.net> <4j525l$mi5@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts31-16.tor.inforamp.net
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <4j525l$mi5@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>,
- bigrex@primenet.com (Bob Nixon) wrote:
- >Win-95 can do 10-11k/sec or max out the 115200 dte without com overruns
- >even when do heavy multitasking. Actually Win-95 can support DTE's of up
- >to 960000. I have mine set for 230000 for all the good that does. My high
- >priced courier has a max dte of 115200.
-
- Since you seem to know something I don't, can you explain how Win95 can do
- 960000 bps on standard serial hardware when the UARTs in question are
- programmed by setting a divisor from a 115200 bps base clock? Or are you
- simply mentioning that Win95 has support for some nonstandard hardware?
-
- --
- Geoffrey Welsh, Developer, InSystems Technologies Inc.
- Temporary: crs0794@inforamp.net; At work: insystem@pathcom.com
- At home: geoff@zswamp.uucp or [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff
- Capitalism is a cold-hearted system which guards the interests of whoever's
- at the top, yet hypocritically claims that it offers everyone a fair shot.
- So is every other system ever put in place by man.
-